Bailout? Or Smart Investment?

A great deal has been written so far about the government’s proposed $700 billion purchase of mortgages. Almost all of it presents it as a huge taxpayer burden and a hard blow for the government’s finances.

I had to look through many articles before I found any discussion of how the government is actually going to purchase the mortgages. When I finally found it, I was very pleased.

The government is going to hold a “reverse auction”. They’re basically going to say “ok, who wants to sell us some 6 month delinquent stated income mortgages, and how good a price are you willing to give us?” Then the government will take offers. If one bank offers to sell at 20 cents on the dollar and the other bank requires 25 cents on the dollar, the government will first buy at 20 cents. It may never get to the 25cents bank, since the amount it will buy is finite. That gives the banks considerable incentive to sell their mortgages to the government (i.e. the taxpayer) on the cheap.

What happens then? The government sooner or later will either foreclose or restructure each loan that is in default. In order for the taxpayer to lose on this deal, the end sales price has to be even less than what the government paid.

Let’s take an example. Suppose there’s a house in Las Vegas that sold for $400k in 2006 with a 100% $400k mortgage, and is now in default. If the government pays 20 cents on the dollar for that mortgage, the government will write a check to the company holding the paper for $80,000. But the government still has a claim for $400k on the property. When the government forecloses and hands the property over to a LV agent to get it sold, the agent will put it back on the market. How many houses that were worth $400k are worth less than $80k now? The answer is hardly any. Most houses in Vegas are able to sell at prices at about 50% of their peak value. So the agent will sell the house for, say, $175k. The government gets the full $175k, and isn’t obligated to give any of it to the original lender. In this case, the taxpayer will double their money.

So whether or not this bailout costs the US taxpayer, or is even profitable, depends on two things:

1) How good the Treasury Department is at running the auction

2) How much other stuff gets thrown into the legislation by Congress

I’m not too concerned about #1. We are very fortunate to have Paulson in charge. You just don’t get to the top of Goldman Sachs without being very very intelligent. He is driving good deals for the taxpayer. The AIG bailout offer was very punishing to AIG shareholders, as was the negotiated Bear Stearns deal. I don’t think much moral hazard is being created here.

Also, the market level was set recently when Merrill Lynch sold a big set of mortgages for $.22 on the dollar. The buyer is going to make a lot of money on those mortgages, in my opinion.

I’m a little more worried about #2, but we’ll see what gets negotiated this week.

This new bailout could be incredibly profitable for the US taxpayer.


4 Responses to Bailout? Or Smart Investment?

  1. jnh says:

    What happens if the Government decides to re-write mortages at current fair market value ?
    Home owners that are in various stages of foreclosure could reap a huge benefit by getting a reduced mortage (maybe even with lower rates than current).

    This could also encourage other people to stop paying their mortgages, starting another huge foreclose cycle.

  2. Mike Vincent says:

    Six months ago, Paulson declared the economy to be sound & credit crisis contained. Five years Ago, GW Bush failed to “privitize” social security (i.e. Turn it over to WS).

    In light of recent developments, it appears we’re quite lucky WS didn’t get their hands on SS. Furthermore, if your heaping praise upon Paulson for ramrodding Nationalization & socializing our Banks, I suggest you turn over all your present/future profits as well as losses generated by your company to the newly citizen subsidized banking industry. If we’re to pick up your losses…..then surely we want a piece of the action. As long as we’re following this asinine path, WE THE PEOPLE may as well take over some profitable industries as well….like oil companies.

    The answer is repeal of Grahm leach Bliley Act…..evict WS from our Main Street Banks

  3. pkokkinis says:

    Not that easy, FD. Why would a lender agree to sell to the govy at 20 cents/dollar when they can easily sell the property THEMSELVES at 50 cents/dollar. The current situation is a mess, and no one knows if a bailout – in any form – would work. I’d personally love to see all the Vegas lenders holding foreclosures to put them all on auction across a 30 dirty period and sell everything at any price. This, in essense, is a bailout created by the bailee, if you will. The lenders got themselves in this mess afterall, they should “clearance-out” all their bad loans themselves and then start lending again to kick start the RE market. Yeah, it’ll make everything worse in the short term, but its midterm prospects are better than any othe rplan out there.

  4. frothingdeveloper says:

    First of all, in most cases, they don’t control the property. These are either delinquent or in good standing, but not foreclosed upon. It would be desirable if the lenders could get themselves out of the mess but there are no buyers for the mortgages right now, so they’re failing to clear their balance sheets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s